The website has been created with the financial assistance

of the Federal Agency for Press and Mass Communications

of the Russian Federation

Make Infoshos my homepageContact usAdd to FavoritesHome
 
-
Member States:
07:33Astana
07:33Bishkek
07:03Delhi
09:33Beijing
05:33Moscow
06:33Islamabad
06:33Dushanbe
06:33Tashkent
Observer States:
06:03Tehran
04:33Minsk
09:33Ulan-Bator
06:03Kabul
::
06:03Yerevan
07:03Katmandu
04:33Ankara
08:33Phnom Penh
07:03Sri Dzhayavardenepura Kotte

SCO Currencies/Ruble

 
 
Country Code Currency Den. Rate
 
 

The official rate of the Central Bank of Russia

News

12.12.2019 13:35
Russia Aims to Supply 6-16 Sukhoi SSJ100 Passenger Jets to Pakistan
11.12.2019 13:58
India Sees Nationwide Protests Over Citizenship Bill, Congress Blames BJP for Dividing Country
09.12.2019 18:17
Pakistan Army Rejects Reports of Joint Border Patrols with Iran
09.12.2019 15:05
Uzbekistan plans to chair SCO in 2022
03.12.2019 18:25
Kashmirs Special Status, a Mess Created by Congress, Says Prime Minister Modi
03.12.2019 18:21
India Claims Terrorist Violence Declined, Cross Border Infiltration Rises After Kashmir Action
02.12.2019 18:19
Chinese Sanctions to Take Effect Against US Human Rights Watch For Backing Violence in Hong Kong
27.11.2019 17:10
Nepal Seeks Full Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Membership Foreign Minister
26.11.2019 15:21
Iran Eyes Closer Scientific Interaction with SCO
28.10.2019 17:39
Chinese premier to visit Uzbekistan, Thailand
 
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     
Russia's Presidency in SCO SCO Secretariat SCO Business Council The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure Of SCO SCO Interbank Consortium
SCO goal: leaders club or serious international mechanism?
09.03.2011 12:13

This year, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization will celebrate its tenth anniversary. Since its emergence, the SCO has turned into an active and respected regional organization, with many countries showing their interest in it. It has achieved significant success in coordinating the efforts of its member states to ensure regional security. They cooperate in the military sphere, conduct multilateral antiterrorist exercises; their special services exchange sensitive information, coordinate a joint list of terrorist organizations and together fight drug trafficking. There are some achievements in such areas of cooperation as the economy, culture and education, although they are fewer.

At the same time, it is becoming increasingly clear that today sets new tasks for the organization. Its fate depends on whether it is able to respond to current challenges and cope with existing problems, overhauling its work. In fact, the question the SCO is facing today is whether it will be developing as a club of leaders and ministers, where there is little real work done between meetings and high-profile statements or it will be able to become a serious international mechanism active in all spheres and with an influence comparable to that of such big brothers as ASEAN or APEC, or perhaps, even exceeding theirs.

Problem of SCOs expansion

Until recently, all members of the SCO and most experts believed that the number of its participants should not be increased for the time being, since it should first be established as it is, set straight its mechanisms and gain experience. There was an unspoken agreement not to admit new members. It was unspoken because, in fact, it contradicted the SCO Charter, which declared that the organization was open.

Meanwhile, interest in the SCO in the world was growing. In 2006, Pakistan, which had the status of an observer, applied for accession as a full member. Another observer, Iran, followed suit in 2007 and 2008. In 2010, yet another observer, India, said it wanted to become a full member.

The meeting of the SCO Heads of State Council in Tashkent in June 2010 endorsed the Resolution on the procedure of admitting new members. The document clearly sets criteria a new member should meet.

The SCO summit in Astana is expected to adopt a standard memorandum, which will be the last step in creating the official framework for accepting new members. After that, it will be difficult to reject aspirants, citing the absence of necessary documents.

Russias position is related to its active support to India as a candidate for a full member in the SCO. It was spelled out in a joint Russian-Indian declaration on expanding strategic partnership, which was signed by the two countries leaders during Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singhs official visit to Russia upon invitation from President Dmitry Medvedev in December 2009.

Admission of such a big and generally successfully developing country as India would seriously increase the SCOs international authority and influence. The great powers international weight and scale would contribute to making the SCO the worlds biggest international organization for the aggregate population of its members after the United Nations. It would significantly increase its political weight and economic attractiveness among developing countries, since the successful Chinese development model would be supplemented with the Indian one, which is perhaps no less successful.

It would also assist in resolving a number of problems the organization is facing. One of the SCOs main goals is to intensify cooperation in Central Asia. Russia actively cooperates with China within the SCO in achieving these goals, with Beijing acknowledging Russias traditional interests in the region, and Moscow welcoming Chinas stabilizing economic presence.

Indias interests in Central Asia fully coincide with those of the SCO member states, and its development goals are quite in line with the organizations tasks. India is a secular state that is actively fighting ethnic nationalism, separatism and religious extremism. It has experienced the threat of terrorism. In recent decades, India has been successfully developing its economy, and its unique economic model, which is oriented towards the domestic market and has shown its advantages during the latest global crisis, could supplement other attractive development models of the SCO member states.

Indias admission would seriously contribute to stabilizing the situation and accelerating economic development of Central Asian states. India has a long history of relations with the region. There was time when Central Asia, Afghanistan and northern parts of India were within one state. Today, India continues developing active trade and economic ties with Central Asia and makes solid investment here. Strengthening of its economic position in the region would not contradict the interests of other SCO members, but would serve the common purpose the regions economic development, simultaneously balancing the growing economic influence of the West, especially, of the European Union.

India could make a big contribution to the SCOs efforts to stabilize the situation in Afghanistan and to resolve related problems. It has already invested over $1 billion in Afghanistan reconstruction projects and could seriously support the SCO programs seeking to stabilize the Afghan economy.

At present, the country most opposed to Indias admission to the SCO is China. It cites a number of arguments, first of all, that the fairly young SCO, after admitting such a large country, will face numerous organizational problems that will be difficult to resolve, its appearance will change drastically, and the decision-making process, which is already not easy, will become even more difficult. In the past, Russia agreed to this argument, by the way, but later reconsidered its position.

Overall, this is all true. Indeed, the organization will have to introduce a third language English and expand the Secretariat, RCTS, etc. But, given Indias significant financial potential, all these problems can be resolved. Most probably, India will have a quota in the SCOs permanent bodies that will be equal to those of Russia and China, but it will also contribute a corresponding sum to the organizations budget.

On a broader scale, Russia and China that are seen as the SCOs leaders simply because of their size, will of course have to share their influence in the organization. But this requires a strategic decision. What is more important, ones own influence within the SCO or the growth of the organizations influence in the world? It would seem that the latter is much more important.

This was the train of thought followed by the most influential international alliances NA TO, EU and ASEAN when deciding on expansion. Their expansions did bring about some problems, with bureaucracy increasing, the consensus being more difficult to achieve when making decisions, the level of manageability and pace of decisionmaking somewhat declining. The balance of forces within the organizations also changed, sometimes not in favor of their founders. Nevertheless, positive results surpassed the negative ones. Similarly, admission of Pakistan, which officially applied for the SCO entry before India, should be welcome as well. Of course, its economic role within the SCO would not be as big as that of India. However, Pakistan is playing a key part in regulating the situation in Afghanistan and has a significant economic and political influence in the region.

Of course, bringing Indian-Pakistani disagreements to the SCO would be a challenge for the young organization. At the same time, it should be remembered that both India and Pakistan are members of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAAR C) which doesnt hinder its functioning. Recently, the SCO has been actively involved in resolving problems related to Afghanistan. Naturally, these problems can hardly be considered without embracing Afghanistan itself. In this connection, it seems that the existing mechanism of the SCO Afghanistan contact group is no longer sufficient, and it is time to think of giving Afghanistan at least the status of an observer.

Expansion and organizational reform

Opponents of the SCOs expansion often argue that the more members, the more difficult it is to manage the organization and the less efficient its staff. This is not always so. The SCO staff has been prone to insufficient efficiency from the very beginning and the organizations expansion, paradoxically, may create an incentive for its reform. Admission of new members will already mean serious changes, and these members will look at the organization of the permanent bodies from a fresh perspective.

What is the perceived problem of the SCOs permanent bodies, first of all, its Secretariat? The Secretariat based in Beijing is not exactly an independent body of an international organization, pursuing its own policy. It is a conglomerate of representatives of its member states, with each countrys foreign ministry able to send or withdraw any employee there at any time. Naturally, such employees are subordinated more to their own foreign ministries, often represented by the national coordinator, than to the Secretary General. Any minor issue like a trip to an event in another country or appropriation of a small sum from the budget has to be coordinated with the Council of foreign ministers.

However, the experience of the most efficient international organizations (UN , EU, ASEAN , etc) shows that employees of their permanent bodies should be international officials, they should not depend on their countries governments. The SCO Secretariat urgently needs a reform in this area. The following measures are required to achieve this: 1) the SCO Secretariat should be given the right to dispose of the organizations budget without consulting the Foreign Ministers Council or the member states foreign ministries; 2) all positions within the Secretariat should be filled on a competitive basis.

A special commission should be set up for this purpose. A contract with a person employed this way should be subject to cancelling only by the Secretariat as the employer if it is not satisfied with the worker, not by the desire of a member states foreign ministry.

Another relevant organizational issue is the reform of the decision-making process. Already today, the formal understanding of consensus allows Uzbekistan to actually block cooperation in the economic and cultural spheres. Tashkent flatly refuses to participate in educational programs (notably, the SCO University) and in the SCO Youth Council. Of course, the positions of all SCO member states should be respected, but on the other hand, the lack of interest in joint projects on the part of one member, should not block the possibility of cooperation between the rest. Here it is possible to learn from the experience of other international organizations. For example, the EU history shows that expansion results in gradual abolition of the principle of consensus.

Expansion and economy

Economic cooperation is the weakest area of the SCOs activities. There are virtually no multilateral economic projects. President Medvedev pointed to the need to intensify economic cooperation within the SCO both at the Yekaterinburg summit in 2009 and at the Tashkent summit in 2010.

Involvement of such big economies as India and Pakistan could become an incentive to develop economic cooperation within the SCO and to launch multilateral projects.

The main reason for stalled economic cooperation is the absence of a mechanism to finance multilateral projects. The SCOs budget is too modest and it is not meant for these purposes. Talk about setting up a SCO Fund or a Development Bank has been going on for a long time, but it is yet to be set up. Russia suggests a Development Fund (a special account) as a mechanism to finance pre-project work, first of all in such sectors as energy, transportation and high technology. It implies that the implementation of these projects will be financed by the SCO Interbank Consortium. This position comes from the belief of some Russian ministries that in case a bank is set up, China, which has huge financial possibilities, will dominate it,while Russia would prefer to actively use the Eurasian Development Bank that was set up within the Eurasec and where Russias share is significantly higher than that of other participants.

This position seems short-sighted. A SCO bank with Chinas participation would have far more financial possibilities than the Eurasian Development Bank (where the only other active member besides Russia is Kazakhstan), and part of its funds could go to projects in Russia. It seems that it is in Russias interests to agree to the setup of a SCO Development Bank, making sure that China and Russia contribute equally to its capital (like they do to the SCO budget) and, consequently, have an equal number of votes.

  • Add Comment
  • Print

Leave a comment

*
*
*
 

More

Uzbekistan plans to chair SCO in 2022
09.12.2019 15:05
Iran Eyes Closer Scientific Interaction with SCO
26.11.2019 15:21
Chinese premier to visit Uzbekistan, Thailand
28.10.2019 17:39
Cooperation Across the Continent: How Russian-Chinese Relations Evolved in Recent Years
23.09.2019 17:45
Russia, India Pledge to Continue Trade, Economic Cooperation With Iran
04.09.2019 17:31
SCO Secretary-General meets with EU Special Representative for Central Asia
12.07.2019 16:25
SCO Kunming International Marathon receives IAAF Bronze Label
12.07.2019 16:23
India should clearly demarcate its fundamental interests
08.07.2019 17:57
Sri Lanka expects to become a full member of SCO soon
28.06.2019 14:02
SCO, BRICS need to deal with fake news
04.06.2019 16:17

Comments(5)

08.03.16 00:52
Free Rechage Rs 130 nly For today,
use free wifi & get 3gb 3G data Free.
http://www.multilinesolution.com/
08.03.16 00:51
Free Rechage Rs 130 nly For today,
use free wifi & get 3gb 3G data Free.
http://www.multilinesolution.com/
08.03.16 00:51
Free Rechage Rs 130 nly For today,
use free wifi & get 3gb 3G data Free.
http://www.multilinesolution.com/
Fantastic goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you are just too wonderful.

.