Yuri Veselov, military commentator Middle Eastern NATO isnt coming through / SCO Shanghai Cooperation Organization

The website has been created with the financial assistance

of the Federal Agency for Press and Mass Communications

of the Russian Federation

Make Infoshos my homepageContact usAdd to FavoritesHome
 
-
Member States:
00:29Astana
00:29Bishkek
23:59Delhi
02:29Beijing
22:29Moscow
23:29Islamabad
23:29Dushanbe
23:29Tashkent
Observer States:
22:59Tehran
21:29Minsk
02:29Ulan-Bator
22:59Kabul
::
22:59Yerevan
23:59Katmandu
21:29Ankara
01:29Phnom Penh
23:59Sri Dzhayavardenepura Kotte

SCO Currencies/Ruble

 
 
Country Code Currency Den. Rate
 
 

The official rate of the Central Bank of Russia

News

03.12.2019 18:25
Kashmirs Special Status, a Mess Created by Congress, Says Prime Minister Modi
03.12.2019 18:21
India Claims Terrorist Violence Declined, Cross Border Infiltration Rises After Kashmir Action
02.12.2019 18:19
Chinese Sanctions to Take Effect Against US Human Rights Watch For Backing Violence in Hong Kong
27.11.2019 17:10
Nepal Seeks Full Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Membership Foreign Minister
26.11.2019 15:21
Iran Eyes Closer Scientific Interaction with SCO
28.10.2019 17:39
Chinese premier to visit Uzbekistan, Thailand
26.09.2019 14:42
Turkeys Excuse: Erdogan Chases for Uighurs in Syria
23.09.2019 17:45
Cooperation Across the Continent: How Russian-Chinese Relations Evolved in Recent Years
06.09.2019 16:02
Rosoboronexport sums up the results of MAKS-2019
06.09.2019 15:55
Russian industry is progressing despite sanctions
 
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     
Middle Eastern NATO isnt coming through
22.04.2019 13:15 Yuri Veselov, military commentator

Donald Trumps seemingly unexpected decision to withdraw two thousand American servicemen from Syria wreaked havoc among the European and Middle Eastern allies of the United States. The Kurds that are part of the so-called Western coalition were the first to panick: left without the US cover, they would be unlikely to withstand the onslaught of the Turkish military machine and would be destroyed in a matter of days.

However, under the pressure from his opponents, the US president was forced to backtrack on his hasty decision and introduce an amendment that reduces the number of servicemen to be evacuated and extends the evacuation timeline. Under the new plan, 400 American servicemen will stay in the area bordering on Turkey, while the rest will be transferred to the al-Taif base in Syria, at the junction of the borders with Iraq and Jordan. In addition, the Pentagon has not set a specific deadline for these manipulations. But all the military will stay on the Syrian territory.

Nature abhors vacuum, they say. The same is true about Syria, with neighboring Turkey is eager to invade the country under the pretext of ensuring security of its southern borders. President Erdogan is overwhelmed with desire to establish control over one third of the Syrian territory where the bulk of hydrocarbon reserves, water resources, irrigated arable land, aerodromes and other strategic military and civilian facilities are concentrated. But to do this, it is necessary to overcome the resistance of Kurdish military groups, which are still allies of the United States. And Ankara does not have enough trump cards against Washington. Moreover, the consequences of such military confrontation could be unpredictable for Turkey

Americans do not want to get into a serious quarrel with Turkey either, it being their most reliable and strongest ally in the region, despite its certain rapprochement with Russians and Iranians. Washington is only too aware of that. The Pentagon tried to persuade monarchies of the Arab peninsula to allocate troops for deployment in the northern part of Syria so as to at least pretend restricting Erdogans attempts at seizing the region. The legal framework for the establishment of inter-Arab deterrent forces could be adopted at the level of heads of government and state of the League of Arab States. All the more so, as Syrias membership in the organization has been suspended.

But The Arab world in general and each country in particular are in a deep political crisis, which is unlikely to fade away in the near future. Arab monarchies are bogged down in a war against militants in Yemen and cannot spare troops for presence in Syria. All other countries, with the exception of Jordan, perhaps, are busy with the exhausting fight against international terrorists spread across the region and solving domestic political problems.

So Washington had to give up the idea of using Arabs in Syria.

However, it would undermine trust in the United States if it let its former allies of the Western coalition be destroyed. In this situation, it needs to convince its European NATO allies of the need to replace Americans in Syria and to enter the country as multinational troops as was done in the Lebanon in 1984. In northern Syria, there are small forces of the French and British armies and several tens of experts from other countries. Finding someone in Europe willing to please Americans in this area is like shooting fish in a barrel. Notably, certain East European countries that have acquired a new status will be only too willing to do this.

But the decision to deploy multinational troops in any country of the world must be made by the UN Security Council, with adoption of a relevant resolution, which goes against the interests of Syria, and also of Russia and Turkey. Therefore, the American idea to involve NATO in containing Turkey in Syria seems another reckless scheme that will never be carried out.

In the current situation, Washingtons policy in Syria is inevitably moving to a deadlock, which can be broken only by complete withdrawal of all US military from the countrys northeastern region. Back in 2013, leaders of Syrian Kurds were warned about the potential negative impact of their cooperation with the Pentagon. But they did not arrive at proper conclusions.

The current state of relations between leaders of this Syrian community and the central government can be described as non-existent: the Kurds want to get de facto political, administrative and economic independence from the state. All attempts of Russia to persuade them to take a more restrained approach have so far failed. But Moscow continues with the private dialog, since there are sensible leaders within the Kurdish community who are able to compromise in order to assert the hopes of their people for a better life without security guarantees from the foreign military.

  • Add Comment
  • Print

Leave a comment

*
*
*
 

More

Kashmirs Special Status, a Mess Created by Congress, Says Prime Minister Modi
03.12.2019 18:25
India Claims Terrorist Violence Declined, Cross Border Infiltration Rises After Kashmir Action
03.12.2019 18:21
Chinese Sanctions to Take Effect Against US Human Rights Watch For Backing Violence in Hong Kong
02.12.2019 18:19
Turkeys Excuse: Erdogan Chases for Uighurs in Syria
26.09.2019 14:42
Belarusian President Offers to Launch Joint Anti-Terror Effort of UN, EU, CSTO, CIS, SCO
04.09.2019 14:53
Battle for Idlib continues
04.06.2019 15:47
SCO Secretary-Generals speech at the high-level international conference International and Regional Cooperation on Countering Terrorism and Its Finan
20.05.2019 18:28
Kommersant: SCO members deem terrorism as major threat
17.05.2019 10:37
Need For Stronger SCO Role Against Terrorism
25.04.2019 10:40
CIS border guard chiefs meet in Uzbek capital 27 years later
22.04.2019 13:49

Comments(0)

.